Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:35

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Mountaineers Walk Off Kentucky in NCAA Opener - West Virginia University Athletics
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Screen time and physical activity habits linked to adolescent stress and depression - PsyPost
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
How can a 54-year-old man build muscle without using steroids?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Suspect in custody after 11 stabbed at Oregon homeless services provider - NBC News
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
GOP megabill could undermine US energy production, Republicans warn - Politico
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Are INFJs essentially the most introverted type?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.